A Mir Case Essay

In the Case, A Mir Case thither be many an separate(prenominal) Organizational Behavioural issues involved. at that place was no squad viscidness amongst the researchers and this was in a large offend referable to the composition of the team. This composition in itself created many pass over heathen, gender and communication issues, which resulted in the dispute amongst the individuals. One factor that influences team cohesion is the members similarities and in this case we infer the Russians constructing their own group ( collect to their similarities and cultural beliefs and views) and the sore international researches forming another group amongst themselves.another(prenominal) division amongst the group was due to the run-in barriers. . Language differences are a enormous source of communication noise as it lessens effective communication as linguistic communication and meanings can be easily misunderstood. along with the language barrier, there was to a fault c ross cultural and cross gender communication issues. The Japanese and Austrian saw the comprehension of the female participant to be positively dedicated and treated her with respect, the Russians felt she had to be endured and catched at her as a sex-symbol and not a team member.There were also cultural differences as the Russian were seen to be more aggressive and dominating and while the Austrian, the Japanese and the French researcher saw the touch as a form of familiar molestation, the Russians saw nothing wrong in this stolen kiss. These actions by the Russians (which were due in part to the cultural differences) now has serious repercussions as the other researchers now felt as though they were in a offensive environment which in turn leads to high school levels of stress.To make matters worse, there was no interference by a intermediatory or leader from IBMP to help suffice the remainder which only further escalated the problems. Within the individuals there was no emergence of a leader and no mavin to agree complaint of the situation and knead towards resolving the conflict. In essence, the lack of team dynamic and cohesion and the cross cultural specialty totally escalated to a conflict that was never fixed or addressed rather it was avoided by Moscows Institute for biomedical Problems (IBMP), who classes the conflict as all a part of the look into.As menti whizzd in the case, the project of the experiment was to learn about the dynamics of isolation, as they would apply this knowledge to the external Space Station, who would be sending mountain into space for long periods of time. For this to work, the group would in reality conduct to learn how to work effectively as a team and how to bounce back conflicts that would naturally arise. In this situation, the individuals really need roundone to step up as a leader and curb charge of the situation. This would be a positive step, as the leader can work with the individua ls to form a cohesive team and inform some conflict re declaration.However this solution give be challenging as the Russians will probably not postulate to listen to someone who is not Russian and due to their aggressive nature, the other researchers may not want a Russian as their team leader either. As a result it would really take an understanding, open, motivated and influential person to take charge of this team. The individuals also needed conflict resolution. The company should have a bun in the oven looked at terzetto party conflict resolution as a means of working by dint of this issue.This would be best as it would be an outside person who is able to be neutral and help the conflicting parties resolve their differences. However this mediator would interfere with the experiment, because if this concomitant did take place in space, there would be no mediator to send. imputable to the fight and the kiss, this conflict escalated to a very high level as one individual felt violated. As a result conflict management is decidedly needed. Though IBMP did not want to intervene, inner harassment is a serious take up and needed to be addressed. A mediator needed to get involved to work through this crisis.A mediator will not only help to go around the issue but will demonstrate the researchers who were upset with the incident that the company is not avoiding the issue but is taking it seriously. That mediator would first off have to look at ship canal to reduce unlikeiation by creating common experiences. The mediator would have to find a way to describe the cross cultural differences and show the Russians that what is satisfactory in their culture is not in others and vice versa. The researchers need to find the commonalities at bottom each other in install to live and work more effectively. subsequently differentiation has been reduced the mediator would also have to look at ways to improve communication and understanding. Through this experim ent IBMP would be able to tell the world-wide Space Station (and implement in future experiments) that you cannot isolate people with different genders, cultures, languages together without first giving them a chance to get to know one another. The group should be asked to choose a team leader first and effrontery some time to form their team dynamics.The group should be able to socialise together, learn about each others ultures and lifestyles and go through the team processes of storming and norming before being isolated in space. The group should also be accustomed some regulations to follow, as ambiguous rules range to lead to conflict. Certain common norms, for example, that informal harassment and violence will not be tolerated should be instituted. Of course due to the different cultures, it will have to be clarified what is meant by sexual harassment and violence. With a good group dynamic, with a clear team leader and some rules in place the group should be able to re duce conflict and unravel more effectively.